Comparison: OWL 360 Rendering vs Unreal Panoramic Capture

See visual examples of the OWL 360 Rendering Pass vs the Unreal Panoramic capture to compare rendering speed and visual quality

Written by Off World Live

Updated 4 months ago

All examples are rendered in 8K cubemap format (7,680x4,320) with 8 spatial samples on a 4090 GPU with identical project settings.

The titles show the render time for each of the images for both the OWL Cam and the Unreal panoramic.

Images are presented without comments so users can make their own conclusions.

Underwater: OWL (left) vs. Unreal Pano (right)

Please click the image to use the slider to compare.

Interior: OWL (left) vs. Unreal Pano (right)

Please click the image to use the slider to compare:

Cave: OWL (left) vs. Unreal Pano (right)

Please click the image to use the slider to compare:

Landscape: OWL (left) vs. Unreal Pano (right)

Please click the image to use the slider to compare:

City: OWL (left) vs. Unreal Pano (right)

Please click the image to use the slider to compare:

Did this answer your question?